Agri Service Ethiopia

          Empowered Community make Difference
in partnership                              
with EED, Trocaire, EU,DCA, Novib & ActionAid
Google
Home  |  About ASE  | CBIs  |  Publications  |  Links
Program Components
Participatory Research
Indigenous Knowledge
Farmer Innovation
Community Learning
Natural Resource Management
Crosscutting Issues
Planning, Monitoring & Evalution
Challenges & Lessons
ASE's Best Practices
ASE's IFSP Achievments
ASE's IFSP Challenges
ASE's IFSP Lessons
Miscellaneous
Small Grant Projects
News & Events
Researches & Abstracts
 

Networking Guideline


Acronyms

SHs

Stakeholders

ASE

Agri-Service Ethiopia

FTC

Farmers Training Center

MOU

Memorandum of Understanding

AOTP

Action Oriented Training Program

IRDP

Integrated Rural Development Program

IFSP

Integrated Food Security Program

TOR

Terms of Reference

ATVET

Agricultural, Technical & Vocational Education & Training

PO

Program Office

GO

Government organizations

NGOs

Non Government Organizations

CRDA

Christian Relief and Development Association

1. INTRODUCTION

2. THE NEED FOR NETWORKING

3. OBJECTIVES OF THE GUIDELINE

4. DEFINITION AND TYPES OF NETWORKING

5. PRINCIPLES AND MODALITIES OF NETWORKING

6. BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES OF NETWORKING

7. STEPS IN NETWORK ESTABLISHMENT

8. ELIGIBLE NETWORK AGENDAS OF ASE

9. POSSIBLE NETWORK PARTNERS OF ASE

10. ASE STRATEGIES OF NETWORKING

11. BIBLIOGRAPHY

INTRODUCTION

Establishment of Agri-Service Ethiopia (ASE) dated back to the 1969. It is an indigenous and non-for -profit humanitarian organization. ASE aims to enhance the capacity of rural communities and improve their livelihoods. It has undergone several changes in approaches to rural development. Correspondence Training (1969-1976) was the initial development approach until 1986 when it implemented Face-to- Face Training approach. ASE again realized Action Oriented Training Program (AOTP) (1987-1996) with the intention that training alone could not bring about substantial change in rural livelihoods. In 1997, ASE shifted its development strategy to Integrated Rural Development Program (IRDP) and implemented it until 2000.

Agri-Service Ethiopia currently runs Integrated Food Security Program (IFSP) in four areas of Amhara, Oromia and Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Regional States (SNNP). The major program components are Community Empowerment (Training and Institution Building), crop and livestock production and productivity enhancement, Natural resource management, Social development (health, education, and water supply), Gender equity, and Participatory Research and networking.

Believing that group efforts with other similar organizations and targeted farmers are indispensable in achieving the desired mission, ASE has been involved in various networks with different actors. Networking has to be strengthened further to maximize its benefit. To this effect, this document is prepared to direct the ways in creating, organizing, operating and sustaining networks.

2. THE NEED FOR NETWORKING

Most of the world’s people still live in rural areas. The livelihood of 85% of the Ethiopian population depends on agriculture. From its very nature, Agri-Service Ethiopia has been running various agricultural development activities that are expected to improve the livelihoods of poor farmers. Different humanitarian and development actors have also been involved in similar activities. However, their individual endeavor has to be linked in such a way that strengthens policy dialogue and operational collaboration, information disseminations, experience sharing, capacity building and solidarity in bringing recognizant impacts on the livelihood of the poor. Nowadays, networking is seen as the best way for development partners to achieve their objectives in an efficient and effective manner.

Networking bridges information and experience gaps through initiating interaction and dialogue, inter-personal communications, and cross-sectoral links between organizations so that useful knowledge is shared and channeled to develop best management practices and provides practical decision support. With the help of information and collaborative approach, stakeholders can broaden the scope of their actions and try to address issues, which have been beyond their capacity. Networking for knowledge sharing caters to the thirst for information, builds up awareness among the change agents and encourages active participation of communities and individuals in the development endeavors. Furthermore, it creates a mechanism, which enables articulation and sharing of local knowledge with potential for further enrichment of this information as it passes through network users. Networking has a crucial role to identify efficient development interventions, minimize duplication of activities, reduce communication costs and create access to information and resources. Further, networks are effective instruments in helping communities break from the narrow national and local outlooks. In general, networking states ‘strength in unity’. The national and international experiences ascertained these facts.

ASE has also benefited from its engagement in various networks, and it aims at maximizing the benefits from such establishments and believes that networking improves resource mobilization, utilization, and bringing all actors together to enhance synergies.

3. OBJECTIVES OF THE GUIDELINE

This guideline is generally designed to suggest procedures in which networking is established, sustained, managed, coordinated, operated, monitored and evaluated.

Specific objectives are, therefore, to: 
  • elaborate the concept, principle and modalities of networking,
  • indicate the benefit and challenges of networking,
  • establish common understanding in networking engagement and sustenance,
  • identify issues for which networking is necessary,
  • propose possible implementation strategies of networking, and
  • set up monitoring and evaluation mechanisms

4. DEFINITION AND TYPES OF NETWORKING

4.1 Definitions
Networking:
It refers to a mechanism or system of interaction or relationship between and/or among different parties (individuals, organizations/ institutions) with common vision. It is a free exchange of information, ideas, and resources to accomplish individual or group goals in the conditions of interdependence. Partnership: It is a continuum of relationships that fosters the sharing of resources and responsibility among two or more individuals, entities, and/or organizations that share joint interest, goal and objectives for the purpose of mutual benefit and agree to joint action. Individuals or organizations that have a side-by-side effort and shared sense of purpose and a shared responsibility for an outcome can form this kind of relationship. It is the highest and tighter form of interaction with equal power relationships among partners.
Collaboration:
It is a process of individuals or organizations working together, sharing resources and responsibilities jointly to plan implement and evaluate programs in order to achieve a common purpose. It enhances and helps expand capacities of SHs for mutual benefit. This form is looser and even there are cases where one organization collaborates the other without setting common objectives only because it may have the resource and experience. In general terms, there are no hard and fast rules that state how these relations should be done and all of them convey the idea that two or more organizations work together for a common Purpose. One of these forms can be used depending on the degree of closeness, authority and responsibilities, power and other resources that ASE wishes to have. Throughout this document, the term “partner’ shall be considered as stakeholders who are members in a network or partnership or collaboration.

4.2 Types of Networking

Networks differ in terms of agenda, geographical span, structure, and duration and categorized consequently as follows:
a) Agenda based Networking
This classification is made based on agendas. Thematic Network: Members who have a shared concern revolving around one theme can form network. Based on the mission of ASE, Thematic Networking can be established on the following issues: 
  • Food Security,
  • Land tenure,
  • Family Planning,
  • Gender,
  • Agricultural biodiversity,
  •  HIV/AIDS,
  •  Microfinance,
  • Agricultural Marketing,
  • Organic farming,
  • Poverty,
  •  Rural Energy
  • Community Training/Extension, and
  • Institution building
    • Sectoral Network:
      Members who are interested in a sector may form this type of network. Education, Agriculture, Health, and Natural Resources management are sectors that ASE intervenes. Therefore, Sectoral Networking can be formed accordingly.

      b) Geographical scope based classification This classification is based on geographical coverage of the network. Networks can be formed at International, National, Regional, Zonal, Woreda, and Kebele levels. Hence, ASE shall involve at all levels of geographical boundary.

      c) Structure based Networking It is a classification based on the degree of legal assigning of responsibilities among partners.

      Informal networking:

      This form of networking has no formal structure and secretariat to co-ordinate it. The group forming the network maintains communication and the responsibility of co-ordination lies entirely on the members’ initiatives. Specifically, Informal Networking can be established in Information disseminations, and Experience sharing.

      Formal networking:
      Networks that require resource sharing and mobilization should have formal structure. The network in this case shall have chair and secretariat to co-ordinate activities. Memorandum of Understanding or terms of reference should be prepared where duties and responsibilities of the network partners are clearly defined.

      d) Duration based Networking

      Classification of networks can also be made based on the period for which the network is operational.

      For sustainability purpose and degree of importance of the concern, Network shall be formed for long period of duration, which is called Permanent Network.However, it is also possible to establish Ad hoc Networks to accomplish a certain mission and will either be extended or phased-out then after. Such networks can be formed to immediate and urgent cases like hunger, war, flood, epidemic diseases etc.

      5. PRINCIPLES AND MODALITIES OF NETWORKING

      ASE as an organization shall follow the principles and modalities indicated hereunder.

      5.1. Principles

      I. Clear vision and purpose Clear vision and purpose of a network are prerequisites for effective and successful networking. A network with well-defined vision and purpose is a binding bond for members to stay and work in close contact. Statement of purpose shall consist of values, the members of the network, reasons for the existence of the network, what is going to be accomplished, the operational environment /opportunities and threats/, the target group, and uniqueness of the network. The vision and purpose of ASE shall also be reflected in the statement of purpose and shall the ASE management at different levels endorse.

      II. Commitment It is an internal decision/dedication to perform the vision to reality. Networking in development works takes time and resources of partners involved for whom in most cases no bill can be offered. Each partner has to be committed to sacrifice what is expected from him or her for sustainable network. Individuals, who are the members of a network either as a representative of ASE or personal initiative, must discharge all duties and responsibilities expected from them. With approval of the management of the respective offices of ASE, the represented/self-represented personnel have to contribute the necessary time and resources to the network in which s/he is working and the contribution of represented/self-initiated person has to be informed to the immediate supervisor.

      III. Effective leadership Democratic and non-authoritarian leadership is vital for an effective network. Experience confirms that in most networks concerned with development works or activities, the initiative or the initial setting-up is arranged by one or few organizations. In such position, some of the partners might be more active and will have easier access to funding sources than others. Though an initiator is necessary to demonstrate the benefits of networking to potential partners, it should not dominate the others. Therefore, as a representative of our organization, we have to promote effective leadership to establish a structure in which all partners get equal benefit on equal base.

      IV. Willingness Basically, entry into or/and exit from a network shall be on voluntary motives. However, once we are engaged in the name of the organization, we must be willing to take potential risks of a network. Partners are expected to understand and share risks and thereby willing to accept possible decisions made for risk-aversion purposes. As networkers for the organization, try to identify potential risks and possible remedies, consult with the decision-making body/committee and reach at consensus before disclosing views in risk aversion process.

      V. Respect Networking shall create an enabling environment where partners are open to discuss ideas and alternative ways of looking at problems. Respect all members equally, be transparent and consult openly to bring efficient utilization of individual expertise and experience, which in turn re-enforce creativity.

      VI. Accountability and transparency Decision making process and the flow of information should be democratic and transparent among the network members. ASE as a member must be accountable for any action in the course of the network process. It should also have equal status with other partners to deal and discuss in planning, implementing, and monitoring and evaluation of common activities and programs.

      VII. Sharing of collective resources As the strength and viability of a network depends on its members, sharing of resources to partners shall be taken as convention. Specific skills, information and materials owned by ASE shall be made accessible to others and ASE has to get access for the same from others. Efforts shall be geared towards contributing to the strength of our organization in particular and the network in general.

      5.2. Modalities

      ASE selects five modalities of networking, which are described in detail here under. Hence, when ASE staff builds a network, one or more of these modalities shall be used.

      1. Exchange of knowledge, information and experience A network can be established for sharing of knowledge, information and experiences. There are many organizations with common vision and wide spectra of expertise, experience and information. ASE is an organization with much experience, knowledge, and information in the development field that it can share to others and also has gaps to be filled through networks. When networks are to be initiated, it should be to link together these elements to build the capacity of ASE towards accomplishing its goals expressed in programs and their components. Networks shall provide knowledge, information and experiences, which were not there before and should help us bring positive change in our integrated food security interventions and give us new insights in designing strategies and frameworks.

      2. Resource Mobilization A Network creates an enabling environment for optimum utilization of existing capabilities and facilities among all stakeholders. Services like training, communication, Documentation, workshops, meetings and conferences may be costly for ASE alone. In addition, if the provision of such services is limited to its scope only, resources will not be utilized at their optimum level. In order to use such resources at optimal level, ASE has to agree with its partners to share resources through the networks. The decision making unit/the management committee of ASE must approve resources allocated and mobilized.

      3. Community Mobilizations, Policy Advocacy and Lobbing These refer to activities performed to promote the position and views of grassroots through ASE in the development process. Hence, Networks shall strengthen the participation of ASE in the formulation of development policies and strategies. In this connection, networks help to organize conferences, prepare publications and communicate decision makers to contribute their part in the development endeavors. ASE shall provide an essentially local knowledge input to policy formulation and implementation. Moreover, since we are working with grassroots, we may some time need to urge government to take the pathway ahead in promoting fair practices. In this case, networking shall be formed to assist mobilization of grassroot communities to build alliances and develop issue-based solidarity over issues. Hence, Networking shall be formed to provide capacity and autonomy to them for exercising their roles and struggle for the task of emancipation.

      4. Research Coordination ASE undertakes research on different topics, which could also be related to topics dealt by other organizations. This is costly and duplication for the nation. Therefore, network can be established to coordinate research works in order to avoid duplication of efforts, minimize cost and improve the quality of research by executing related research works together. The priority research agendas shall be land tenure, food security, gender, and natural resources management.

      5. Marketing and Technical Support Recall that integrating into the global economy calls for producing competitive products in terms of quality, prices and availability. Marketing networks, therefore, shall be established to provide a platform for farmers to get information about the kind of product that they have to produce, to assess markets for their products, to enable them to sell their produce in markets that fetch them the best returns. In addition it can help them get technical support.

      6. BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES OF NETWORKING

      6.1 Benefits Engagement in networking shall be for the benefit of the organization in achieving its pre-determined development goals. Hence, we have to be clear to what benefits shall we join a network. The following list shows some of the benefits that ASE shall gain.

      a) Knowledge, experience and Information: ASE shall benefit from sharing recent information on trends, challenges, opportunities, and best practices in poverty reduction in general and improving the livelihood of rural poor in particular.

      b) Participation in formulation and implementation of Policies: ASE shall strengthen its status to participate in formulating and implementing policies, strategies, procedures, and frameworks related to rural development.

      c) Professional Development/capacity building: ASE staff shall build their capacities through attending seminars, conferences, trainings and workshops. The technical capacity and competency of staff and hence organizational performance and strength shall be improved by sharing documents and other publications from database of the networks and individual members. d) Resource Sharing: Networking shall be used as an effective means of using resources at their optimal scale to resources operating at sub-optimal level due to limited scale of operation.

      6.2 Challenges The following are some of the potential challenges that we have to predict from Network engagement:  Biased attitudes of management members and dominant partners  Unbalanced commitment towards Networks  Lack of experience in Networking  Lack of attention in coordinating due to heavy duties for top leaders of Networks  Dictatorial conduct of top-coordinators of Networks  Lack of accountability, respectfulness, and transparency  High staff turnover and irregularities of attendance of network representatives  Lack of reliable source of finance  Lack of enabling environment for Networking formation and operation  Inadequate means of communication and information  Lack of enforcement mechanism on members to execute commitment  Mismatched expectations from members  Conflict of interest from other networks Hence, tolerance and valuing the principles are desirable. Moreover, appropriate solutions shall be opted and recommended to avoid fragmentation and to sustain the network.

      7. STEPS IN NETWORK ESTABLISHMENT Establishment of networks could be commenced by initiative of donors, individuals, or organizations. Regarding the steps, adopt the following.

      Step 1. Assessment and selection of partners  Search for organizations that have similar vision with ASE and get exhaustive information about them.  Create contacts through advertisement, letters, e-mail and/or direct contact and get detail information and screen  Based on the information gathered, prepare a comprehensive report on potential partners and submit to screening committee, which is expected to be formed by ASE.  The screening committee shall select partner organizations and report to the management, which the committee is accounted for. The criteria for eligibility of an organization for partnership may vary depending on the interest of the organization and nature and purpose of the task as well. However, the following elements shall be considered as some of the qualities as criteria to choose partner organizations. Credibility: acceptance to many stakeholders; Competence: relevant skills and experience, proven track record and acknowledged past experience; local knowledge; Representation: community ties, accountability to beneficiaries; Governance: sound and empowering internal management, transparency, financial accountability, and efficiency; Legal status: the organization must have legal status Institutional capacity: sufficient scale of operations, facilities, and equipment.

      Step 2: Conduct consultations, prepare concept notes and signing Memorandum of Understanding Conduct meetings, seminars, and workshops for consultation and discuss all matters among the network stakeholders to reach at a consensus. The concept note is one that clearly explains the concept or the core idea of the network motive. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) shall consist of:  Vision, Mission, Mandate, Values, Strategies, Objectives and Goals of the network,  Membership  Duties and responsibilities of each partner,  Sources of budget, and budget imbursement rules and regulations, and  Resource contribution, allocation and utilization procedures and regulations. The following are some of the envisaged sources of budget:

      a) External Donors

      b) Membership fees

      c) Agencies that have similar programmes

      Appointed personnel can prepare the draft document of the memorandum of understanding and the document can be further reviewed through conducting further consultations among partners. If in case partners are not willing to sign MOU, it is possible to proceed with TOR. In that case, ensure organizational commitment by obtaining a letter of commitment from each participating organization written on organization’s letterhead and signed by highest authority possible.

      Step 3. Prepare action plan The Action plan shall consist of the following contents:  Activities to accomplish objectives,  Targeted groups,  Resource Requirements  Time frame  Locations where the activities are performed,  Executive bodies and accountability  Expected outcomes and impacts, and  Possible verifications for the completion of tasks Attach the action plan to the MOU

      8. ELIGIBLE NETWORK AGENDAS OF ASE The following, among others, are list of network agendas:  Food security  Agriculture  Agricultural biodiversity  Gender  HIV/AIDS  Natural Resources Management (including land, and Water)  Participatory Research  Microfinance  Agricultural Marketing  Organic Agriculture  Poverty  Conflict management  Rural development  Family planning  Energy  Institution building  Community Training/Extension

      9. POSSIBLE NETWORK PARTNERS OF ASE  Line Ministries,  Woreda offices,  Local government institutions,  Bilateral Agencies,  Private Sector,  The Research Community,  Other NGOs (national and international),  Institutions of higher learning (Universities, colleges, ATVET)  Farmers’ training centers  Community based organizations/institutions

      10. ASE STRATEGIES OF NETWORKING The following are suggested as implementation strategies to networking:

      10.1 Establishment of committee An internal committee shall be established at the head office as well as the PO levels. The committee shall review and present recommendations for higher decision-making units. The organization monitors and evaluates the network operation through this committee and representatives shall report the status of the network (s) on a quarterly basis. This is important for the sustainability, success and deepening of networking in ASE.

      10.2 Capacity Building This helps strengthening and upgrading the capacity of partner organizations in operating with networks. Hence, adopt the following:  Organize workshops, seminars, meetings, exchange visits, and short-term trainings to stakeholders  Prepare relevant materials  Support the development of other forums that facilitate the free exchange of ideas and information, as well as the sharing of resources.

      10.3 Starting at pilot projects Adopt the following to materialize this:  Design community-led pilot projects or programmes for the core agenda of the network at initial phase.  Support community driven initiatives  Generate successful experiences for diffusion

      10.4 Encourage community participation Targeted groups for whom the network is formed shall be encouraged to participate in planning, implementing, and evaluating the programmes performed for the benefit of them. The community at large or the representative (s) shall involve in the networks. To encourage participation, execute the following:  Conduct consultation meetings and invite them to participate  Respect their views and orient the network agenda and purposes in accordance to their needs and problems  Pass on roles and responsibilities

      10.5 Awareness Raising Disseminate information, activities, innovations, and best practices of the network (s) to enhance awareness. To put this in effect;  Create forums and invite more SHs from GO, NGOs, policy delegates, and media personnel.  Prepare annual and progress reports  Prepare publications such as magazines, manuals, leaflet, brochures, etc. within a certain time interval

      10.6 Monitoring and evaluation Networks shall be monitored, evaluated, and revised on a regular basis, which is determined by SHs in a participatory manner. Periodic review shall be set to review operational procedures, progresses made, lessons learnt, challenges faced, the status and benefits gained from the networks.

    • For the purpose of monitoring and evaluation, 
    • Establish baseline data 
    • Develop and promote indicators and best practices  Provide feedback to policy makers; 
    • Establish an evaluation framework for outputs and key processes

    Signal observations

    The following signals could be used as an indication of success: 

    • Reliable budget and devotion of member organizations, 
    • Respectfulness among member organizations, 
    • Efficiency, effectiveness and leadership quality of the secretariat, 
    • Intra and inter organizational relationship, coordination and cooperation,  Commitment,
    • Transparency and accountability of member organizations, 
    • Sharing experiences and exchanging information, 
    • Respect and trust between different interests, 
    • Common vision, mandates or agendas, 
    • Compatible ways of working, and flexibility, and 
    • Participatory decision-making process.

    The following signal (s) could indicate (s) failure: 

    • Conflict among member organizations, 
    • Domination of few organizations (individuals) over others, 
    • Lack of clear purpose and common vision within member organizations, 
    • Differences of philosophy and ways of working, 
    • Lack of communication, 
    • Poor participation, over expectation, fragmentation and frustration 
    • Members seeking benefit with no costs, 
    • Commitment to coordinate at policy level and no translation down to the field staff; 
    • Junior staffs sent to meetings 
    • Collective decisions are not binding 
    • Financial and time commitments outweigh the potential benefits,

    These could be signs for failure and put your efforts to strengthen and sustain the network as early as possible.

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Akalewold Bantirgu (2002): Assessing your networking engagement. Briefing note for NGOs, Christian Relief and Development Association (CRDA).

    Hailemariam H/Meskel (2004): Benefits and challenges of Networking: An overview of experience of ASE, paper presented on “SNNPR HIV/AIDS NGO Forum, and NGO proposal and Reporting Requirements workshop”, 6-28 January 2004, Awassa, Ethiopia.


You can also have the PDF version

 
Copyright © 2007 Agri Service Ethiopia. All rights reserved.
Contact Address: Tel. 251-11-4651212, Fax. 251-11-454088, P.O.Box 2460, Email. ase@ethionet.et